Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 06:57

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What is a good source for finding job candidates?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Tether overtakes Tron, DEXs with $432M in revenue – How and what next? - AMBCrypto
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What’s next?
Thank you.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Cynthia Erivo Stuns in a Sculptural Beaded Corset at the Tony Awards 2025 - instyle.com
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Australia's Qantas to close budget airline Jetstar Asia - BBC
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Canadian Robot Finds a Weight Beneath the Ocean Equivalent to 250 Million Elephants - Jason Deegan
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
The USB-C dream is dead and it’s too late to revive it - Android Authority
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
While you sleep, these bugs throw a party on your face - East Idaho News